CMS froze Medicare enrollment for new O&P providers in February: the moratorium's six-month clock is nearly up

On February 27, 2026, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services quietly shut the door on new suppliers trying to enter the durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies program, the billing category that covers nearly everything an amputee or limb-different person gets through Medicare. The stated reason was fraud and abuse. The mechanism was a moratorium on new enrollment.

The O&P EDGE reported this week on the compliance risks this creates for existing providers. That is a real concern for clinics. But the moratorium also has consequences on the other side of the appointment room.

What the moratorium actually does

DMEPOS is not a device type. It is a supplier category. O&P clinics that bill Medicare for prosthetics, orthotics, and related supplies do so as enrolled DMEPOS suppliers. The enrollment moratorium means that any clinic, group, or individual practitioner that is not already enrolled as of February 27 cannot begin billing Medicare for DMEPOS items until CMS lifts the freeze.

The moratorium does not affect:

• Providers already enrolled and billing Medicare before the freeze date
• Existing patients receiving care from currently enrolled clinics
• Claims submitted under already-established provider numbers

What it does affect is the edge where supply and demand meet access. A new O&P clinic opening in a rural county cannot enroll during the moratorium. A practitioner who left private practice and wants to return cannot re-enroll. A group practice opening a second location as a separate enrollment cannot add it. Wherever the provider network was thin before February 27, it cannot grow during the freeze.

Why CMS imposed it

CMS has used enrollment moratoria in DMEPOS before. The category has a documented history of fraudulent billing: suppliers billing for equipment not delivered, suppliers billing for patients who were not clients, organized schemes using stolen beneficiary information to generate claims. The February 2026 moratorium follows that pattern: a system-wide pause to allow enhanced screening, background checks, and site visits before new suppliers join the program.

The moratorium had a planned six-month duration from the imposition date. Six months from February 27 is August 27, 2026.

The moratorium expired on schedule on August 27, without an extension. CMS let the freeze lapse on its planned end date.

What happened when the clock ran out

CMS let the moratorium expire on August 27 without announcing an extension or a replacement mechanism. The formal freeze on DMEPOS supplier enrollment ended on its planned date.

Providers who were blocked from enrolling or re-enrolling can now submit applications. Practices that needed to re-enroll after a change of address, a structure change, or an enrollment irregularity can begin resolving those situations. New clinics in areas that lacked enrolled providers can enter the queue.

One question that remained open at the expiration: whether CMS would apply enhanced screening requirements as a condition of reopening, which would function as a softer version of the freeze. As of the expiration date, CMS had not announced such requirements. The absence of an announcement is not the same as a confirmed clean reopening; it means the terms of the reopening were not fully visible yet.

O&P professional associations, including AOPA, had been tracking the enrollment path closely. Their published guidance is the right place to watch for any conditions CMS applies as the queue processes.

The patient-facing consequence

If you are currently receiving prosthetics or orthotics care from a Medicare-enrolled provider, the moratorium has not interrupted your care and almost certainly has not changed how your claims are processed. The practical effect lands elsewhere.

The provider access gap in rural and underserved areas was a documented problem before the moratorium. In regions where the nearest enrolled O&P clinic is a significant drive, the moratorium’s enrollment freeze means that gap cannot be filled by new entrants to the market for however long the freeze holds. If a clinic in an underserved area closes during the moratorium period (because the owner retired, because the practice was acquired and restructured, because the building lease ended), the enrolled provider number does not automatically transfer to a new entity. Someone would have to re-enroll, and they cannot.

For Medicare beneficiaries in areas where this plays out, the relevant questions are:

• Is your current O&P clinic currently enrolled and billing Medicare without interruption?
• If you were planning to establish care with a new provider, is that provider already enrolled?
• If you live in an area with limited provider options and are seeing a clinic that may face a transition, it is worth confirming their Medicare enrollment status before that transition occurs rather than after.

None of those questions require you to understand DMEPOS enrollment law. They can be asked directly at the front desk of any clinic. The answer should be straightforward.

The compliance bind on the provider side

A detail worth naming because it connects to the access picture: during the moratorium window, enrolled providers who encounter an enrollment irregularity cannot simply re-enroll to resolve it. A solo practitioner who changes practice addresses, a clinic expanding into a new state, or a provider whose enrollment paperwork has a documentation gap all face the same closed door. In ordinary times these situations are resolved by correcting and resubmitting the enrollment. During the moratorium, they accumulate.

The O&P EDGE has been tracking the compliance implications of this for O&P practices. The indirect patient consequence is that compliance pressure concentrating on smaller, independent O&P clinics can accelerate consolidation: when the administrative overhead of running an independent practice spikes, some practices sell to larger organizations or close. The result for patients is a provider market with fewer independent options and, in some markets, more distance required to reach care.

The next useful question

The moratorium’s end closes one question and opens another. The question now live: how quickly does the backlog clear, and where does provider availability actually improve?

DMEPOS enrollment under ordinary conditions involves accreditation, site inspection, and processing time measured in months. Six months of accumulated demand from providers who could not apply does not clear in a day. Practices that submitted applications in late August are entering a queue, not a cleared network. The timeframe for new providers to appear in Medicare plan directories and begin billing is probably late fall at the earliest for applications filed this week.

For patients in areas where the provider network was thin during the freeze, the practical picture is: the ceiling has lifted, but the room fills at the pace of CMS processing, which has historically been slow. Checking Medicare’s Care Compare directory again in several months may produce different results than a search run during the moratorium.

For more on what the expiration did and what comes next for providers and patients, see our coverage of the moratorium’s end.

---

Amputee News does not provide individualized insurance, billing, or benefits advice. Medicare DMEPOS coverage and supplier enrollment status can change. For questions about your specific coverage, contact your Medicare plan directly or call 1-800-MEDICARE. For help navigating access issues, a State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) counselor can review your situation at no cost.